Skip to content
Sun 14 Jun · 20:00 UTC · 22:00 CEST · Group F

full time

Netherlands2–2Japan

2023-3rating1993+138thdown 1fifa18th
T. Reijnders2071talismanH. Ito2007

AT&T Stadium, Dallas · 80,000 seats

Missed it. It stays up.

Netherlands to win

home 39%draw 26% ✓away 35%

sealed Thu 11 Jun · 18:54 UTC · 20:54 CEST · nothing deleted

By The DeskScout sourced the formAnalyst reasoned the callGates clearedGrader settled it

locked Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:54:02 GMT · model elo-davidson-features-v1

The read

No prose on this one. The desk let the number do the talking. The call stands, and it goes on the record either way.

The ratings

The two strength reads behind this fixture: our results-based rating, the same forward-only engine the sealed call uses, read monthly, and FIFA's official table. Up is stronger on both lines; green is climbing, red is sliding. Context beside the call; the sealed number does not move.

Netherlands

ProofXI rating

2023-3 this year

2026 → 2023 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

8thdown 1 place on the latest list

7th → 8th · 6 lists

Japan

ProofXI rating

1993+13 this year

1980 → 1993 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

18thheld on the latest list

18th → 18th · 6 lists

the gap on our board today: Netherlands by 30 points

Head to head

Netherlands have had the better of this fixture.

3 prior meetings · Netherlands 2, drawn 1, Japan 0 · goals 6-2

  1. 2013Netherlands 2-2 Japan· Friendly· neutral
  2. 2010Netherlands 1-0 Japan· FIFA World Cup· neutral
  3. 2009Netherlands 3-0 Japan· Friendly

source · international results feed

How we got hereWe make Netherlands the stronger side, and seal the call at about 4 in 10. Open for the working.openclose

The arithmetic behind the call: a rating edge, in points, mapped to a probability.

Netherlands rating edge+19
Home advantage0 (neutral venue)
Net edge+19

Davidson Elo→1X2 turns that +19 edge into 39% / 26% / 35% for home, draw, away.

Ratings only. Recent form and rest are not modelled for national sides.

How it could go

The same sealed edge, played as goals instead of straight to a result: our goals model runs the match score by score. The call above stands, this is its texture.

Netherlands

1.3

expected goals

Japan

1.3

expected goals

The scorelines it sees most

  • 1113 in 100
  • 109 in 100
  • 019 in 100
the fuller goal pictureopenclose
  • 218 in 100

three or more goals: 48 in 100 · clean sheet: Netherlands 28 in 100, Japan 26 in 100

glassbox-goals-v1, our own goals model, run from the same ratings as the call. Frequencies, never a market.

The scorecard

  • Netherlands win at home.✗ wrong
  • No blowout: Netherlands win by a single goal at most, if at all.✓ right
  • An open game in which both teams find the net.✓ right

The team sheets

The confirmed elevens, as named. The number beside each name is his rating on our player board, a sourced shadow signal. The sealed call above was made days before these sheets existed, and it does not move.

Netherlands4-3-3

  1. 1Bart VerbruggenG1935
  2. 22Denzel DumfriesD2012
  3. 6Jan Paul van HeckeD1958
  4. 4Virgil van DijkD1965
  5. 15Micky van de VenD1827
  6. 8Ryan GravenberchM1978
  7. 21Frenkie de JongM2036
  8. 14Tijjani ReijndersM2071
  9. 24Crysencio SummervilleF1905
  10. 18Donyell MalenF2046
  11. 11Cody GakpoF1978

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

Japan3-4-2-1

  1. 1Zion SuzukiG1671
  2. 16Tsuyoshi WatanabeD1672
  3. 3Shogo TaniguchiD1691
  4. 21Hiroki ItōD2007
  5. 10Ritsu DoanM1775
  6. 24Kaishu SanoM1763
  7. 15Daichi KamadaM1877
  8. 13Keito NakamuraM1673
  9. 8Takefusa KuboF1761
  10. 11Daizen MaedaF1636
  11. 18Ayase UedaF1704

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

source: api-football.com · fetched Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:02:41 GMT

The timeline

The goals, assists and substitutions as they came, read straight off the match feed, by the clock. Sourced facts; the call above was sealed days before any of them.

  1. 51'V. van Dijkgoalassist R. Gravenberch
  2. 57'K. Nakamuragoalassist T. Kubo
  3. 64'C. Summervillegoalassist R. Gravenberch
  4. 66'J. Ito for D. Maedasub
  5. 70'M. Depay for D. Malensub
  6. 70'T. Koopmeiners for C. Summervillesub
  7. 70'Q. Timber for T. Reijnderssub
  8. 75'T. Tomiyasu for T. Watanabesub
  9. 75'K. Ogawa for T. Kubosub
  10. 75'Y. Sugawara for R. Doansub
  11. 81'N. Ake for R. Gravenberchsub
  12. 84'K. Shiogai for A. Uedasub
  13. 85'B. Brobbey for C. Gakposub
  14. 88'D. Kamadagoalassist K. Ogawa

source: api-football.com · fetched Sun, 14 Jun 2026 22:14:25 GMT

Full time

Missed it.

Netherlands 2-2 Japan

Verdict
wrong but well reasoned
Claims right
2/3

The debrief

We sealed Netherlands to win at 39%, about 4 in 10, before kickoff. Full time said Netherlands 2-2 Japan: the draw, an outcome we had at 26 in 100.

The call missed, but the reasoning mostly held. That is what a probability is, the chance we sealed for what happened is exactly how often this should hurt. It stays up. The claims went 2 of 3.

What we got wrong, by name

  • Netherlands win at home.

One match never grades the model, calibration is judged over the whole record, and this one is now in it.

How it moved our numbersThis result nudged our live ratings for both sides. Open for the signed moves.openclose

On the live national Elo, this result moved Netherlands -2 and Japan +2.

On our player board, the squads moved Netherlands -21 (16 appearances) · Japan +26 (16 appearances).

Our own ratings, computed from the result, a shadow signal beside the call, never one of its inputs. The sealed forecast above does not move.

THE DESK AT WORK

  1. ScoutSourced the inputsPulled both sides' ratings.
  2. AnalystWeighed the edgeNet edge +19 after home advantage; drafted 3 checkable claims.
  3. ModelMapped it to a distributionDavidson Elo→1X2 → 39/26/35 (home/draw/away).Favourite: Netherlands · 39%
  4. ScribeFiled the readPrepared the read behind the call.
  5. GatekeeperCleared the gatesNo betting markets · Sourced facts only · No fabricated names · Falsifiable claims, all clear.
  6. The DeskLocked the callLocked Netherlands v Japan before kickoff.

A replay of how this call was built. Real steps, paced to read. The model owns the favourite; the desk sources and explains it.

Behind the glass

The pipeline

  1. Researchinputs sourced
  2. Forecastlocked before kickoff
  3. Drafthouse template
  4. Gatesall checks passed
  5. Publishshadow
  6. Gradescored vs the result

The checks

  • No betting markets

    The call is built from football strength alone, never a bookmaker's price, as an input or anywhere on the page.

  • Sourced facts only

    Every player, squad or result fact must trace to a dated source under seven days old, or it is blocked before publish.

  • No fabricated names

    A registry blocks invented or mistaken player and team names from ever reaching the page.

  • Falsifiable claims

    Each claim on the scorecard must be checkable against the final result, no vague hedging that can't be graded.

The performance, Possession 59% / 41% · Shots 10–10 (on target 6–3) · Corners 5–4.