Skip to content
Sun 21 Jun · 22:00 UTC · Mon 00:00 CEST · Group H

full time

Uruguay2–2Cape Verde Islands

1974-25rating1685+7116thup 1fifa67thup 2
F. Valverde1998talismanJoão Paulo1576

Hard Rock Stadium, Miami · 64,767 seats

Missed it. It stays up.

Uruguay to win

home 65%draw 21% ✓away 14%

sealed Fri 19 Jun · 19:30 UTC · 21:30 CEST · nothing deleted

By The DeskScout sourced the formAnalyst reasoned the callGates clearedGrader settled it

locked Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:30:31 GMT · model elo-davidson-features-v2

The read

No prose on this one. The desk let the number do the talking. The call stands, and it goes on the record either way.

The ratings

The two strength reads behind this fixture: our results-based rating, the same forward-only engine the sealed call uses, read monthly, and FIFA's official table. Up is stronger on both lines; green is climbing, red is sliding. Context beside the call; the sealed number does not move.

Uruguay

ProofXI rating

1974-25 this year

1999 → 1974 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

16thup 1 place on the latest list

16th → 16th · 6 lists

Cape Verde

ProofXI rating

1685+71 this year

1614 → 1685 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

67thup 2 places on the latest list

67th → 67th · 6 lists

the gap on our board today: Uruguay by 289 points

How we got hereWe make Uruguay the stronger side, and seal the call at about 7 in 10. Open for the working.openclose

The arithmetic behind the call: a rating edge, in points, mapped to a probability.

Uruguay rating edge+273
Home advantage0 (neutral venue)
Net edge+273

Davidson Elo→1X2 turns that +273 edge into 65% / 21% / 14% for home, draw, away.

Ratings only. Recent form and rest are not modelled for national sides.

How it could go

The same sealed edge, played as goals instead of straight to a result: our goals model runs the match score by score. The call above stands, this is its texture.

Uruguay

1.8

expected goals

Cape Verde Islands

0.8

expected goals

The scorelines it sees most

  • 1013 in 100
  • 2012 in 100
  • 1111 in 100
the fuller goal pictureopenclose
  • 2110 in 100

three or more goals: 48 in 100 · clean sheet: Uruguay 44 in 100, Cape Verde Islands 17 in 100

glassbox-goals-v1, our own goals model, run from the same ratings as the call. Frequencies, never a market.

The scorecard

  • Uruguay win at home.✗ wrong
  • Uruguay win comfortably, by two goals or more.✗ wrong
  • Uruguay keep it tight, at least one side is shut out.✗ wrong

The team sheets

The confirmed elevens, as named. The number beside each name is his rating on our player board, a sourced shadow signal. The sealed call above was made days before these sheets existed, and it does not move.

Uruguay4-2-3-1

  1. 23Fernando MusleraG1710
  2. 13Guillermo VarelaD1845
  3. 3Sebastián CáceresD1592
  4. 16Mathías OliveraD1886
  5. 25Juan SanabriaD1583
  6. 5Manuel UgarteM1933
  7. 6Rodrigo BentancurM1874
  8. 14Agustín CanobbioM1863
  9. 8Federico ValverdeM1998
  10. 20Maximiliano AraújoM1883
  11. 21Federico ViñasF1539

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

Cape Verde4-1-4-1

  1. 1VozinhaG1554
  2. 22Steven MoreiraD1534
  3. 4PicoD1542
  4. 3Diney BorgesD1553
  5. 13Sidny Lopes CabralD1792
  6. 6Kevin LeniniM1561
  7. 18Telmo ArcanjoM1521
  8. 20Ryan MendesM1480
  9. 10Jamiro MonteiroM1523
  10. 11Garry RodriguesM1490
  11. 9Gilson TavaresF1521

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

source: api-football.com · fetched Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:21:18 GMT

The timeline

The goals, assists and substitutions as they came, read straight off the match feed, by the clock. Sourced facts; the call above was sealed days before any of them.

  1. 21'K. Leninigoal
  2. 44'M. Araujogoal
  3. 45+6'A. Canobbiogoalassist M. Araujo
  4. 46'D. Duarte for T. Arcanjosub
  5. 58'N. Da Costa for Benchimolsub
  6. 58'H. Varela for G. Rodriguessub
  7. 61'H. Varelagoal
  8. 70'N. de la Cruz for M. Ugartesub
  9. 70'D. Nunez for F. Vinassub
  10. 71'L. Duarte for K. Leninisub
  11. 80'Y. Semedo for J. Monteirosub
  12. 81'B. Rodriguez for M. Araujosub

source: api-football.com · fetched Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:21:13 GMT

Full time

Missed it.

Uruguay 2-2 Cape Verde Islands

Verdict
wrong and wrong
Claims right
0/3

The debrief

We sealed Uruguay to win at 65%, about 7 in 10, before kickoff. Full time said Uruguay 2-2 Cape Verde Islands: the draw, an outcome we had at 21 in 100.

The call missed and the reasoning went with it. Nothing here gets softened: the claims that failed are named below, and the miss goes on the record at full weight. The claims went 0 of 3.

What we got wrong, by name

  • Uruguay win at home.
  • Uruguay win comfortably, by two goals or more.
  • Uruguay keep it tight, at least one side is shut out.

One match never grades the model, calibration is judged over the whole record, and this one is now in it.

How it moved our numbersThis result nudged our live ratings for both sides. Open for the signed moves.openclose

On the live national Elo, this result moved Uruguay -20 and Cape Verde Islands +20.

On our player board, the squads moved Uruguay -46 (14 appearances) · Cape Verde Islands +66 (16 appearances).

Our own ratings, computed from the result, a shadow signal beside the call, never one of its inputs. The sealed forecast above does not move.

THE DESK AT WORK

  1. ScoutSourced the inputsPulled both sides' ratings.
  2. AnalystWeighed the edgeNet edge +273 after home advantage; drafted 3 checkable claims.
  3. ModelMapped it to a distributionDavidson Elo→1X2 → 65/21/14 (home/draw/away).Favourite: Uruguay · 65%
  4. ScribeFiled the readPrepared the read behind the call.
  5. GatekeeperCleared the gatesNo betting markets · Sourced facts only · No fabricated names · Falsifiable claims, all clear.
  6. The DeskLocked the callLocked Uruguay v Cape Verde Islands before kickoff.

A replay of how this call was built. Real steps, paced to read. The model owns the favourite; the desk sources and explains it.

Behind the glass

The pipeline

  1. Researchinputs sourced
  2. Forecastlocked before kickoff
  3. Drafthouse template
  4. Gatesall checks passed
  5. Publishshadow
  6. Gradescored vs the result

The checks

  • No betting markets

    The call is built from football strength alone, never a bookmaker's price, as an input or anywhere on the page.

  • Sourced facts only

    Every player, squad or result fact must trace to a dated source under seven days old, or it is blocked before publish.

  • No fabricated names

    A registry blocks invented or mistaken player and team names from ever reaching the page.

  • Falsifiable claims

    Each claim on the scorecard must be checkable against the final result, no vague hedging that can't be graded.