Skip to content
Tue 16 Jun · 22:00 UTC · Wed 00:00 CEST · Group I

full time

Iraq1–4Norway

1740+65rating1950+9257thfifa31st
Merchas Doski1583talismanE. Haaland2074

Gillette Stadium, Boston · 65,878 seats

Called it. As forecast.

Norway to win

home 17%draw 23%away 60% ✓

sealed Fri 12 Jun · 10:06 UTC · 12:06 CEST · nothing deleted

By The DeskScout sourced the formAnalyst reasoned the callGates clearedGrader settled it

locked Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:06:53 GMT · model elo-davidson-features-v1

The read

No prose on this one. The desk let the number do the talking. The call stands, and it goes on the record either way.

The ratings

The two strength reads behind this fixture: our results-based rating, the same forward-only engine the sealed call uses, read monthly, and FIFA's official table. Up is stronger on both lines; green is climbing, red is sliding. Context beside the call; the sealed number does not move.

Iraq

ProofXI rating

1740+65 this year

1675 → 1740 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

57thheld on the latest list

58th → 57th · 6 lists

Norway

ProofXI rating

1950+92 this year

1858 → 1950 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

31stheld on the latest list

29th → 31st · 6 lists

the gap on our board today: Norway by 210 points

How we got hereWe make Norway the stronger side, and seal the call at about 6 in 10. Open for the working.openclose

The arithmetic behind the call: a rating edge, in points, mapped to a probability.

Iraq rating edge-219
Home advantage0 (neutral venue)
Net edge-219

Davidson Elo→1X2 turns that -219 edge into 17% / 23% / 60% for home, draw, away.

Ratings only. Recent form and rest are not modelled for national sides.

How it could go

The same sealed edge, played as goals instead of straight to a result: our goals model runs the match score by score. The call above stands, this is its texture.

Iraq

0.9

expected goals

Norway

1.7

expected goals

The scorelines it sees most

  • 1112 in 100
  • 0112 in 100
  • 0211 in 100
the fuller goal pictureopenclose
  • 1210 in 100

three or more goals: 48 in 100 · clean sheet: Iraq 18 in 100, Norway 40 in 100

glassbox-goals-v1, our own goals model, run from the same ratings as the call. Frequencies, never a market.

The scorecard

  • Norway win on the road.✓ right
  • Norway win comfortably, by two goals or more.✓ right
  • Norway keep it tight — at least one side is shut out.✗ wrong

The team sheets

The confirmed elevens, as named. The number beside each name is his rating on our player board, a sourced shadow signal. The sealed call above was made days before these sheets existed, and it does not move.

Iraq4-4-2

  1. 12Jalal HassanG1489
  2. 3Hussein AliD1546
  3. 4Zaid TahseenD1507
  4. 5Akam HashemD1509
  5. 23Merchas DoskiD1583
  6. 8Ibrahim BayeshM1506
  7. 16Amir Al-AmmariM1545
  8. 24Zaid IsmailM1526
  9. 17Ali JasimM1490
  10. 18Aymen HusseinF1557
  11. 9Ali Al-HamadiF1516

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

Norway4-3-3

  1. 1Ørjan NylandG1639
  2. 26Julian RyersonD1928
  3. 3Kristoffer AjerD1877
  4. 17Torbjørn HeggemD1750
  5. 5David Møller WolfeD1704
  6. 10Martin ØdegaardM2010
  7. 8Sander BergeM1876
  8. 14Fredrik AursnesM1840
  9. 7Alexander SørlothF1908
  10. 9Erling HaalandF2074
  11. 20Antonio NusaF1787

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

source: api-football.com · fetched Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:31:11 GMT

The timeline

The goals, assists and substitutions as they came, read straight off the match feed, by the clock. Sourced facts; the call above was sealed days before any of them.

  1. 29'E. Haalandgoalassist D. Wolfe
  2. 39'A. Husseingoalassist A. Al Ammari
  3. 43'E. Haalandgoal
  4. 59'Z. Iqbal for Z. Ismaeelsub
  5. 59'M. Farji for A. Al Hamadisub
  6. 73'A. Schjelderup for A. Nusasub
  7. 73'K. Thorstvedt for F. Aursnessub
  8. 73'L. Ostigard for D. Wolfesub
  9. 73'O. Bobb for A. Sorlothsub
  10. 73'M. Saadoon for H. Alisub
  11. 73'A. Qasem for A. Jasimsub
  12. 76'L. Ostigardgoalassist M. Odegaard
  13. 78'Meme for I. Bayeshsub
  14. 81'P. Berg for M. Odegaardsub
  15. 90+6'A. Husseingoal (o.g.)

source: api-football.com · fetched Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:20:53 GMT

Full time

Called it.

Iraq 1-4 Norway

Verdict
right for right reasons
Claims right
2/3

The debrief

We sealed Norway to win at 60%, about 6 in 10, before kickoff. Full time said Iraq 1-4 Norway: the Norway win, an outcome we had at 60 in 100.

The call landed and the reasoning underneath it held. That is the best a forecast gets: right, and right for the reasons we wrote down before kickoff. The claims went 2 of 3.

What we got wrong, by name

  • Norway keep it tight — at least one side is shut out.

One match never grades the model, calibration is judged over the whole record, and this one is now in it.

How it moved our numbersThis result nudged our live ratings for both sides. Open for the signed moves.openclose

On the live national Elo, this result moved Iraq -23 and Norway +23.

On our player board, the squads moved Iraq -214 (15 appearances) · Norway +109 (16 appearances).

Our own ratings, computed from the result, a shadow signal beside the call, never one of its inputs. The sealed forecast above does not move.

THE DESK AT WORK

  1. ScoutSourced the inputsPulled both sides' ratings.
  2. AnalystWeighed the edgeNet edge -219 after home advantage; drafted 3 checkable claims.
  3. ModelMapped it to a distributionDavidson Elo→1X2 → 17/23/60 (home/draw/away).Favourite: Norway · 60%
  4. ScribeFiled the readPrepared the read behind the call.
  5. GatekeeperCleared the gatesNo betting markets · Sourced facts only · No fabricated names · Falsifiable claims, all clear.
  6. The DeskLocked the callLocked Iraq v Norway before kickoff.

A replay of how this call was built. Real steps, paced to read. The model owns the favourite; the desk sources and explains it.

Behind the glass

The pipeline

  1. Researchinputs sourced
  2. Forecastlocked before kickoff
  3. Drafthouse template
  4. Gatesall checks passed
  5. Publishshadow
  6. Gradescored vs the result

The checks

  • No betting markets

    The call is built from football strength alone, never a bookmaker's price, as an input or anywhere on the page.

  • Sourced facts only

    Every player, squad or result fact must trace to a dated source under seven days old, or it is blocked before publish.

  • No fabricated names

    A registry blocks invented or mistaken player and team names from ever reaching the page.

  • Falsifiable claims

    Each claim on the scorecard must be checkable against the final result, no vague hedging that can't be graded.