Skip to content
Sun 21 Jun · 00:00 UTC · 02:00 CEST · Group E

full time

Ecuador0–0Curaçao

2023+30rating1600+8723rdfifa82nd
P. Hincapié2057talismanA. Obispo1705

Arrowhead Stadium, Kansas City · 76,416 seats

Missed it. It stays up.

Ecuador to win

home 75%draw 17% ✓away 8%

sealed Thu 18 Jun · 20:15 UTC · 22:15 CEST · nothing deleted

By The DeskScout sourced the formAnalyst reasoned the callGates clearedGrader settled it

locked Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:15:31 GMT · model elo-davidson-features-v2

The read

No prose on this one. The desk let the number do the talking. The call stands, and it goes on the record either way.

The ratings

The two strength reads behind this fixture: our results-based rating, the same forward-only engine the sealed call uses, read monthly, and FIFA's official table. Up is stronger on both lines; green is climbing, red is sliding. Context beside the call; the sealed number does not move.

Ecuador

ProofXI rating

2023+30 this year

1993 → 2023 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

23rdheld on the latest list

23rd → 23rd · 6 lists

Curaçao

ProofXI rating

1600+87 this year

1513 → 1600 · 13 readings

FIFA world rank

82ndheld on the latest list

82nd → 82nd · 6 lists

the gap on our board today: Ecuador by 423 points

Head to head

They have met once before, and it finished level.

1 prior meeting · Ecuador 0, drawn 1, Curaçao 0 · goals 0-0

  1. 2026Ecuador 0-0 Curaçao· FIFA World Cup· neutral

source · international results feed

How we got hereWe make Ecuador the stronger side, and seal the call at about 8 in 10. Open for the working.openclose

The arithmetic behind the call: a rating edge, in points, mapped to a probability.

Ecuador rating edge+389
Home advantage0 (neutral venue)
Net edge+389

Davidson Elo→1X2 turns that +389 edge into 75% / 17% / 8% for home, draw, away.

Ratings only. Recent form and rest are not modelled for national sides.

How it could go

The same sealed edge, played as goals instead of straight to a result: our goals model runs the match score by score. The call above stands, this is its texture.

Ecuador

2.0

expected goals

Curaçao

0.6

expected goals

The scorelines it sees most

  • 2014 in 100
  • 1014 in 100
  • 1110 in 100
the fuller goal pictureopenclose
  • 309 in 100

three or more goals: 48 in 100 · clean sheet: Ecuador 53 in 100, Curaçao 14 in 100

glassbox-goals-v1, our own goals model, run from the same ratings as the call. Frequencies, never a market.

The scorecard

  • Ecuador win at home.✗ wrong
  • Ecuador win comfortably, by two goals or more.✗ wrong
  • Ecuador keep it tight, at least one side is shut out.✓ right

The team sheets

The confirmed elevens, as named. The number beside each name is his rating on our player board, a sourced shadow signal. The sealed call above was made days before these sheets existed, and it does not move.

Ecuador3-1-4-2

  1. 1Hernán GalíndezG1596
  2. 21Alan FrancoD1708
  3. 6Willian PachoD2037
  4. 3Piero HincapiéD2057
  5. 5Jordy AlcivarM1728
  6. 9John YeboahM1666
  7. 15Pedro ViteM1666
  8. 23Moisés CaicedoM1868
  9. 7Pervis EstupiñánM1838
  10. 19Gonzalo PlataF1892
  11. 13Enner ValenciaF1578

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

Curaçao5-4-1

  1. 1Eloy RoomG1449
  2. 20Joshua BrenetD1509
  3. 3Jurien GaariD1464
  4. 18Armando ObispoD1705
  5. 5Sherel Constancio FloranusD1486
  6. 24Deveron FonvilleD1510
  7. 21Tahith ChongM1547
  8. 8Livano ComenenciaM1486
  9. 10Leandro BacunaM1449
  10. 7Juninho BacunaM1374
  11. 9Jürgen LocadiaF1459

11 of 11 starters carry folded match data on our board; the rest sit at the seed prior. We rate what we've seen.

The bench

source: api-football.com · fetched Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:07:26 GMT

The timeline

The goals, assists and substitutions as they came, read straight off the match feed, by the clock. Sourced facts; the call above was sealed days before any of them.

  1. 46'K. Rodriguez for J. Alcivarsub
  2. 70'N. Angulo for P. Estupinansub
  3. 75'K. Gorre for J. Bacunasub
  4. 76'R. van Eijma for D. Fonvillesub
  5. 76'J. Margaritha for T. Chongsub
  6. 83'A. Preciado for A. Francosub
  7. 83'G. Kastaneer for J. Locadiasub
  8. 84'G. Roemeratoe for L. Comenenciasub
  9. 89'J. Caicedo for J. Yeboahsub

source: api-football.com · fetched Sun, 21 Jun 2026 01:58:25 GMT

Full time

Missed it.

Ecuador 0-0 Curaçao

Verdict
wrong and wrong
Claims right
1/3

The debrief

We sealed Ecuador to win at 75%, about 8 in 10, before kickoff. Full time said Ecuador 0-0 Curaçao: the draw, an outcome we had at 17 in 100.

The call missed and the reasoning went with it. Nothing here gets softened: the claims that failed are named below, and the miss goes on the record at full weight. The claims went 1 of 3.

What we got wrong, by name

  • Ecuador win at home.
  • Ecuador win comfortably, by two goals or more.

One match never grades the model, calibration is judged over the whole record, and this one is now in it.

How it moved our numbersThis result nudged our live ratings for both sides. Open for the signed moves.openclose

On the live national Elo, this result moved Ecuador -23 and Curaçao +23.

On our player board, the squads moved Ecuador -39 (15 appearances) · Curaçao +70 (16 appearances).

Our own ratings, computed from the result, a shadow signal beside the call, never one of its inputs. The sealed forecast above does not move.

THE DESK AT WORK

  1. ScoutSourced the inputsPulled both sides' ratings.
  2. AnalystWeighed the edgeNet edge +389 after home advantage; drafted 3 checkable claims.
  3. ModelMapped it to a distributionDavidson Elo→1X2 → 75/17/8 (home/draw/away).Favourite: Ecuador · 75%
  4. ScribeFiled the readPrepared the read behind the call.
  5. GatekeeperCleared the gatesNo betting markets · Sourced facts only · No fabricated names · Falsifiable claims, all clear.
  6. The DeskLocked the callLocked Ecuador v Curaçao before kickoff.

A replay of how this call was built. Real steps, paced to read. The model owns the favourite; the desk sources and explains it.

Behind the glass

The pipeline

  1. Researchinputs sourced
  2. Forecastlocked before kickoff
  3. Drafthouse template
  4. Gatesall checks passed
  5. Publishshadow
  6. Gradescored vs the result

The checks

  • No betting markets

    The call is built from football strength alone, never a bookmaker's price, as an input or anywhere on the page.

  • Sourced facts only

    Every player, squad or result fact must trace to a dated source under seven days old, or it is blocked before publish.

  • No fabricated names

    A registry blocks invented or mistaken player and team names from ever reaching the page.

  • Falsifiable claims

    Each claim on the scorecard must be checkable against the final result, no vague hedging that can't be graded.