Skip to content

Tim Ream

USA · the desk

Defence, USA

Sourced facts, dated and on the record. Squad membership, and his club when a source names one. Nothing invented; we don’t make players up.

At a glance

  • age

    38

    sourced with the squad

  • position

    Defence

    USA

  • our board

    #1205

    of 1424 rated players

  • folded so far

    2353′

    27 appearances

  • transfer market value (EUR millions), as a rank among peers

    0.20

    16th percentile of peers

Sourced

squad
USA · Defencefootball-data.org · 2026-06-29

Sourced context, nothing more. It never touches a call.

Our rating · the working

the board →

1564 ±45

his quality rating: club, age and measured output. The board orders by this plus his World Cup form, less a discount for how much we can measure him.

How the number is builtopenclose

1539 full roster Elo (−25 from national-team results)

the ± is how settled the number is, more minutes, tighter band

Tier 2, lineups + results, how rich the evidence is, not just how much

at or near his peak, no projected upside from age

Where he starts (his team’s strength, we refuse to invent what we haven’t measured) plus two fixed nudges make the quality rating above; the last line is what national-team results have added since, taking it to his full roster Elo.

starts at USA's strengththe fair club-over-national anchor, every player's starting point
1602
age curve at 38 (defences' curve)measured from the open archive by our own study (defenders: the published literature's shape), never fitted to our calls
-20
transfer market value, a sourced market-consensus quality prior (the stronger reading for him here)his percentile among minutes-qualified peers, from club seasons
-18
quality rating · club, age + measured output
1564
form: national-team results, 27 appearances2353 minutes, weighted by margin, surprise and his match stats, but shared across the XI
-25
full roster Elo · with results
1539

Where the -18 skill term comes from

Not a reputation, a measurement. We score every shot in the data ourselves and rank him among minutes-qualified peers; a fixed arithmetic turns that rank into points.

measured
0.20 transfer market value (EUR millions), as a rank among peers
his rank
16th percentile of qualified peers
scored from
the CC0 Transfermarkt community mirror; a market-consensus quality prior, taken at a capped weight where it reads a player higher than our (fixed, partial) shot/event data can
the arithmetic
46 pts/σ × z(15.8th) = 46 × -1.00 × 0.4 (position weight) = -18

A forward-only shadow signal, as of 2026-06-19. The skill term comes from our own xG models over the open archive; the rest is earned, recorded per appearance, auditable, never back-filled. It never moves a live call.

The notebook

The lines a beat writer keeps, except every one of ours is read off the ledger above, auditable to the night. Nothing invented.

  • standing

    #1205 of 1424 rated players on our board.

  • vs his seed

    The folded nights have cost him 25 points off his seed, kept on the record, like everything.

  • workload

    He barely leaves the pitch: 87′ a night across 27 folded appearances.

What he’d cost · our estimate

We don’t price him yet. Our fee model leans on the level he plays at, and no trusted source has given us his club’s strength. We’d rather show nothing than a number we don’t trust.

The fee record · sourced

The market’s last public word: €3.1m (2012-01). The gap is evidence, many of them, together, recalibrate our model; no single one rewrites him.

  • 2024-08-07Fulham → Charlotteundisclosed
  • 2015-08-20Bolton → Fulhamundisclosed
  • 2012-01-26New York Red Bulls → Bolton€3.1m

Reported moves, dated and attributed (api-football.com), news facts, not a valuation site’s estimates. It never touches a call.

In our coverage · USA’s record

  • v Bosnia & HerzegovinaSealed
  • at Turkey3–2Missed it
  • v Australia2–0Missed it
  • v Paraguay4–1Missed it

The newsroom’s calls on USA. Team-level, never dressed up as a player stat.

Squad · sourced