Ismaël Gharbi

Club football at FC Augsburg.

Sourced facts, dated and on the record. Squad membership, and his club when a source names one. Nothing invented; we don’t make players up.

At a glance

age
21
sourced with the squad
position
Midfield
Tunisia
club
FC Augsburg
football-data.org
club tier
1636
ClubElo strength
our board
#901
of 1424 rated players
folded so far
473′
11 appearances
transfer market value (EUR millions), as a rank among peers
5.00
89th percentile of peers

On the pitch

Minutes on the pitch for Tunisia. The goals come or they do not; we log either.

goals
0
assists
0
caps
9
minutes
444′

goals and assists from our captured match events · caps and minutes from the appearance record

Sourced

squad: Tunisia · Midfieldfootball-data.org · 2026-06-29
club: FC Augsburgfootball-data.org · 2026-06-29

Sourced context, nothing more. It never touches a call.

Our rating · the working

the board →

1687 ±56

his quality rating: club, age and measured output. The board orders by this plus his World Cup form, less a discount for how much we can measure him.

How the number is builtopenclose

1643 full roster Elo (−45 from national-team results)

the ± is how settled the number is, more minutes, tighter band

Tier 2, lineups + results, how rich the evidence is, not just how much

potential ~1653 ±57 a projection, not a measurement: room left on the midfield age curve

Where he starts (his team’s strength, we refuse to invent what we haven’t measured) plus two fixed nudges make the quality rating above; the last line is what national-team results have added since, taking it to his full roster Elo.

starts at Tunisia's strengththe fair club-over-national anchor, every player's starting point: 1686
age curve at 21 (midfields' curve)measured from the open archive by our own study (defenders: the published literature's shape), never fitted to our calls: -26
transfer market value, a sourced market-consensus quality prior (the stronger reading for him here)his percentile among minutes-qualified peers, from club seasons: +28
quality rating · club, age + measured output: 1687
form: national-team results, 11 appearances473 minutes, weighted by margin, surprise and his match stats, but shared across the XI: -45
full roster Elo · with results: 1643

Rating trend

-89 over 12 updates

Seeded from his team’s rating, then moved by the matches he actually played. A shadow signal, it never touches a live call.

Where the +28 skill term comes from

Not a reputation, a measurement. We score every shot in the data ourselves and rank him among minutes-qualified peers; a fixed arithmetic turns that rank into points.

measured: 5.00 transfer market value (EUR millions), as a rank among peers
his rank: 89th percentile of qualified peers
scored from: the CC0 Transfermarkt community mirror; a market-consensus quality prior, taken at a capped weight where it reads a player higher than our (fixed, partial) shot/event data can
the arithmetic: 46 pts/σ × z(89.1th) = 46 × 1.23 × 0.5 (position weight) = +28

Where the -45 was earned

The earned line, opened up by competition. World Cup finals count 1.5×, qualifiers and cups 1×, friendlies and club football half, so a tournament night moves him most.

World Cup finals3 apps · 139′: -27
internationals, qualifiers & cups4 apps · 181′: -8
international friendlies2 apps · 124′: -7
club football2 apps · 29′: -3

His latest nights

2026-06-25World Cup finals · 75′▼ −9
2026-06-21World Cup finals · 50′▼ −13
2026-06-15World Cup finals · 14′ · team result only▼ −5
2026-06-06international friendlies · 62′ · team result only▼ −3
2026-06-01international friendlies · 62′ · team result only▼ −4

Each night’s move blends his team’s result with his own match stats, saves for keepers, tackles and duels for defenders, creation for midfielders, finishing up front. “Team result only” marks games where the feed carried no player stats.

A forward-only shadow signal, as of 2026-06-25. The skill term comes from our own xG models over the open archive; the rest is earned, recorded per appearance, auditable, never back-filled. It never moves a live call.

At this World Cup

What the tournament has done to his rating since the first whistle on 11 Jun, and the matches behind it. Each night’s move blends his team’s result with his own performance, shrunk for sample size, so a strong game nudges the number rather than spiking it.

▼ −27

3 appearances · 139′ · 2 graded by his own stats

The matches behind it

06-25lost by 2 · 75′ · his stats graded▼ −9
06-21lost by 4 · 50′ · his stats graded▼ −13
06-15lost by 4 · 14′ · team result only▼ −5

The same movement shown beside his name on the board, opened up. “Team result only” marks nights the feed carried no player stats. A forward-only shadow signal; it never touches a live call.

The notebook

The lines a beat writer keeps, except every one of ours is read off the ledger above, auditable to the night. Nothing invented.

standing
#901 of 1424 rated players on our board.
vs his seed
The folded nights have cost him 45 points off his seed, kept on the record, like everything.
the rough one
The night that cost him most: −13 – World Cup finals, 2026-06-21. We don't erase those.

What he’d cost · our estimate

€7.5m–€29m ≈ €15m

Not a figure from any valuation site; we don’t republish those. Our own model: the level he plays at, what we’ve measured of him, his age and his role. A band, not a point: we can’t see contract length or release clauses, the two biggest real drivers, so we say so.

The workingopenclose

reference feea mid-tier-club, peak-age forward of average measured skill: €8m
club tier 1636the level he plays at, the strongest signal of what a club pays: ×1.57
ageage 21, the resale premium a club pays for the years to come: ×1.23
attacker fee factorstrikers set the market's top; midfield runs close; defence and goal at the record books' discounts: ×1.00
individual skillour xG model has no confident read on him, priced on club, age and role only, so the band is wide: ×1.00
our estimate: ≈ €15m

fee-model v3 priors (panel-anchored, 2026-06), calibrated against our reported fees. The band is roughly two-in-three likely; contract length and release clauses are data we don’t hold. Context only, it never touches a call.

The fee record · sourced

2025-09-01SC Braga → FC Augsburgloan
2024-08-31Paris Saint Germain → SC Bragafree
2024-07-01Stade Lausanne-Ouchy → Paris Saint Germainundisclosed
2023-09-01Paris Saint Germain → Stade Lausanne-Ouchyloan

Reported moves, dated and attributed (api-football.com), news facts, not a valuation site’s estimates. It never touches a call.

In our coverage · Tunisia’s record

v Netherlands1–3Called it
v Japan0–4Called it
at Sweden5–1Called it

The newsroom’s calls on Tunisia. Team-level, never dressed up as a player stat.